The HSLG took place on Wednesday 14th June in the beautiful surrounds of Dublin Castle. Click here to view the minutes from this meeting. The committee team would like to thank all members who were able to attend the AGM this year, your contributions are very much appreciated.
Date & Time: Fri 18 Aug 2017, 10am – 1pm
Location: Health Sciences Library, UCD- Room D111
This is a half day hands on workshop targeted to MLIS students and recent graduates who want to obtain an overview of the subject of Systematic Reviews. The workshop is led by 3 experienced librarians in this area; Jane Burns, UCD/RCSI, Anne Madden, UCD/St. Vincent’s and Diarmuid Stokes, UCD Liaison Librarian. There are PCs available in the training room so no need to bring your own. The broad topics covered are:
1. Defining Systematic Reviews and what they are about (Jane Burns)
Types and how to decide what to use Tools and Resources (Instruments, etc. )Searching Tips
2. Resources- how and what to use (Diarmuid Stokes)
Databases EndNote (just an overview)
3. Practice Exercises (Anne Madden)
4. What’s in for you as a Librarian? Workshop Wrap up (Jane Burns)
The latest issue of HEAR (Health Evidence Awareness Report) has finally arrived. This issue focuses on Health Literacy and is jam packed with useful links to help you improve your understanding of health information. This issue is also very relevant to healthcare professionals, offering links to resources e.g. guidelines, books, videos and blogs etc that will help you communicate health information to patients more effectively.
HEAR is brought to you by members of the Health Science Library Group.
As part of #Evidenceinformedhealthcare, we would like librarians and information staff to collect and share incidents of their value and impact. Our colleagues in Knowledge for Healthcare are kindly allowing us to use their evidence-based tools to capture this valuable information in the Irish context. (For more information about the KfH value and impact toolkit, see their website)
Tools to download:
Please send all completed forms to firstname.lastname@example.org, so we can share the value of librarians and information staff with our key stakeholders.
Note, we are particularly interested in capturing the value and impact of librarians, rather than simple user satisfaction. The following definitions may be useful.
Methods and procedures for assessing the impact of libraries ISO 16439:2014.
IMPACT – The influence of libraries and their services on individuals and/or on society. The difference or change in an individual or group resulting from the contact with library services;
VALUE – The importance that stakeholders (funding institutions, politicians, the public, users, staff) attach to libraries and which is related to the perception of actual or potential benefit. The input is converted into output by means of processes. The output can have direct, pre-defined effects (outcomes). Output and outcomes can lead to impact and finally to value.”
We are probably all familiar with David Sackett’s (1996) description of evidence based medicine as ‘the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.’ The idea of using best evidence in decision making has since spread beyond medicine to nursing, allied health professionals and other health and social care practitioners.
The terms evidence-based practice and evidence-based healthcare are now used in professional codes, standards and reports throughout the health sector (Bord Altranais agus Cnáimhseachais na hÉireann 2014; Social Workers Registration Board 2014…). These articulate the requirement for professionals to use current best available clinical evidence and individual clinical expertise or judgment to make decisions about the care of individual service users (HIQA 2012). This systematic and reflective approach is essential for patients to get the best outcomes from their care (Ireland DOHC 2008).
For some, an ‘evidence- based’ approach is still too restrictive as it may suggest priority is given to (primarily quantitative) research evidence above other valuable sources (McTavish 2017; Nevo and Slonim-Nevo 2011). ‘Evidence-informed’ is used often these days as it appears to provide more flexibility regarding the nature of the evidence and its use, that is, it implies that many different levels and types of evidence are needed and used to support decisions in evidence-informed practice (Woodbury and Kuhnke 2014).
When we use ‘evidence-informed’ we are explicitly acknowledging the person-centred nature of healthcare; and that those working in this sector must inform decisions using their own expertise, the unique values, preferences and circumstances of patients/clients, as well as the best scientific evidence. Though, as Woodbury and Kuhnke (2014) suggest ‘the terminology is less important than the approach’.
Bord Altranais agus Cnáimhseachais na hÉireann (2014) An Bord Altranais code of professional conduct and ethics for registered nurses and registered midwives, Dublin: Bord Altranais agus Cnáimhseachais na hÉireann
HIQA (2012) National standards for safer better healthcare, Dublin: Health Information and Quality Authority
Ireland, DOHC (2008) Building a culture of patient safety — report of the commission on patient safety and quality assurance, Dublin: Department of Health and Children
McTavish J (2017) Negotiating concepts of evidence-based practice in the provision of good service for nursing and allied health professionals, Health Information & Libraries Journal, 34(1), 45-57
Nevo Isaac & Isaac Nevo and Slonim-Nevo Vered (2011) The myth of evidence-based practice: towards evidence-informed practice, Br J Soc Work (2011) 41 (6): 1176-1197. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq149
Sackett David L, Rosenberg William MC, Muir Gray JA, Haynes R Brian, Rosenberg W Scott (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t, BMJ; 312
Social Workers Registration Board (2014) Standards of proficiency and practice placement criteria, Dublin: CORU
Woodbury M Gail and Kuhnke Janet L (2014) Evidence-based practice vs. evidence-informed practice: what’s the difference? Wound Care Canada, 12(10)
The 2016 annual report of the Health Sciences Libraries Group was submitted to the Library Association of Ireland in December 2016, and published in March 2017.
The report includes brief information about the activities of the HSLG Committee in 2016.
- Secretary’s report
- Chairperson’s report
- CPD report
- Communication Officers’ report
The National Health Library & Knowledge Service of the HSE is leading a national communications campaign in partnership with the HSLG. The aim of the campaign is to highlight the role of librarians and library staff in enabling evidence informed healthcare in the context of the broader patient safety agenda.
The key message for the campaign is ‘Libraries and library staff enable evidence informed healthcare’. The hashtag on Twitter for the campaign is #EvidenceInformedHealthcare.
A logo has been designed for the campaign and is free for all libraries to use to promote the campaign. Please include the hashtag on any promotional material.
The campaign will run for 6 months and is in line with the key recommendations of the SHeLLI report, namely to raise the profile of the library services and promote their value more widely.
The campaign team includes representatives from the HSE, Department of Health, HSLG, National Cancer Control Programme as well as healthcare professionals across Ireland.
More information will be made available in the coming weeks. Please get involved. This is an opportunity to raise awareness of the importance of the work that you do to enable evidence informed healthcare.